What the Church Fathers Believed About the Eucharist

What the Church Fathers Believed About the Eucharist

Some people think the idea that the Eucharist is really Jesus was invented in the Middle Ages.

Somewhere around the time of castles.

And knights.

And people who thought the earth was flat. (They mostly didn’t, by the way.)

So let’s go back further.

Much further.

What the Church Fathers Believed About the Eucharist

Wait… Did the First Christians Believe the Eucharist Was Really Jesus?

A lot of Christians believe:

“The early Church saw the Lord’s Supper as a memorial. The idea of the Real Presence developed later.”

And at first that sounds possible.

Jesus did say, “Do this for a commemoration of me” (Luke 22:19).

But then you read what the first Christians actually wrote, and you have to stop for a second.

Because they said it plainly.

Over and over.

First, What Jesus Said

Jesus told the crowd at Capernaum:

“Amen, amen I say unto you: Except you eat the flesh of the Son of man, and drink his blood, you shall not have life in you.”
— John 6:54

“For my flesh is meat indeed: and my blood is drink indeed.”
— John 6:56

Many disciples walked away (John 6:67).

Jesus let them go.

He did not call them back to explain He meant a symbol.

(We cover this in Why Catholics Believe the Eucharist Is Really Jesus.)

And St. Paul warned that whoever eats unworthily “shall be guilty of the body and of the blood of the Lord” (1 Corinthians 11:27).

You cannot be guilty of the body of someone who is not there.

St. Ignatius of Antioch (c. A.D. 107)

Ignatius was a disciple of the Apostles.

On his way to martyrdom, he warned about heretics who stayed away from the Eucharist and from prayer, because they did not confess that the Eucharist is the flesh of our Savior Jesus Christ, which suffered for our sins and which the Father raised up.

Wait.

The people who denied the Real Presence in A.D. 107 were the heretics.

Ignatius also called the Eucharist “the medicine of immortality.”

St. Justin Martyr (c. A.D. 155)

Justin wrote a defense of Christianity to the Roman emperor.

He explained that Christians do not receive the Eucharist as common bread or common drink.

Just as Jesus became flesh for our salvation, the food blessed by His word is the flesh and blood of that same Jesus who became flesh.

Justin was not writing for insiders.

He was explaining Christian belief to pagans.

And this is how he explained it.

St. Irenaeus (c. A.D. 180)

Irenaeus was taught by Polycarp, who was taught by the Apostle John.

Against heretics who said the body could not be saved, he argued:

Our bodies are nourished by the Body and Blood of the Lord.

How can they say the flesh cannot receive eternal life, when it is fed with the Lord’s own Body and Blood?

His whole argument only works if the Eucharist really is the Lord’s Body.

The Didache (late first century)

This early Christian manual tells Christians to gather on the Lord’s Day, break bread, give thanks, and confess their sins first, so that their sacrifice may be pure.

It quotes the prophet Malachias, who foretold a pure offering to be made among the nations.

The first Christians saw the Eucharist as a sacrifice.

(See Why Catholics Believe the Mass Is a Sacrifice.)

St. Cyril of Jerusalem (c. A.D. 350)

Cyril was teaching new Christians about to receive their First Communion.

He told them not to think of it as plain bread and wine.

It is the Body and Blood of Christ, as the Lord Himself declared.

Even if your senses suggest otherwise, let faith make you sure.

St. Augustine (c. A.D. 400)

Augustine preached to the newly baptized:

The bread you see on the altar, made holy by the word of God, is the Body of Christ.

The cup, made holy by the word of God, is the Blood of Christ.

He also said no one eats that flesh without first adoring it.

What You Won’t Find

Here is the striking part.

You will not find an early Christian writer arguing, “It’s just a symbol, and anyone who says otherwise is wrong.”

There were heated arguments in the early Church about the Trinity, about Christ’s two natures, about Easter’s date.

But the Real Presence was not one of them.

The first major public challenge to it came in the 1000s, and the Church rejected it.

So What Is the Catholic Claim?

Here it is in simple terms.

Jesus said His flesh is real food.

Paul said receiving unworthily makes you guilty of His body.

Ignatius, Justin, Irenaeus, Cyril, and Augustine all said the Eucharist is the Body and Blood of Christ.

The Didache called it a sacrifice.

For a thousand years, no one in the Church seriously argued otherwise.

The Catholic Church teaches that in the Eucharist, Christ is truly, really, and substantially present (CCC 1374).

So the real question is not:

“When did Catholics start believing the Eucharist is Jesus?”

The better question is:

“When did any Christians stop?”

Because the first Christians did not have to be convinced.

They knew who they were receiving.

Keep reading: What the Early Christians Believed About Baptism, or browse more questions in Catholicism Explained.

If this helped you, consider supporting Christian Catholic Media so we can keep creating content.

Catholic Sources

Scripture (Douay-Rheims): Malachias 1:11; Luke 22:19–20; John 6:48–69; 1 Corinthians 10:16; 1 Corinthians 11:23–29.

Catechism of the Catholic Church: CCC 1373–1377 (the Real Presence); CCC 1365–1367 (the Eucharistic sacrifice).

Early Christian writers: The Didache 14 (late first century); St. Ignatius of Antioch, Letter to the Smyrnaeans 7 and Letter to the Ephesians 20 (c. A.D. 107); St. Justin Martyr, First Apology 66 (c. A.D. 155); St. Irenaeus, Against Heresies 4.18 and 5.2 (c. A.D. 180); St. Cyril of Jerusalem, Catechetical Lectures 22 (c. A.D. 350); St. Augustine, Sermon 227 and Commentary on Psalm 98 (c. A.D. 400–415).

Church documents: Council of Trent, Session 13 (1551).

← Back to Catholicism Explained